WHAT DO JUS COGENS NORMS DO FOR THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY?

  • Beatriz Calado de Sousa University of Lisbon, School of Law
Keywords: International law, Jus cogens, Peremptory norms of general international law, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

Abstract

This paper aims to delve into the qualities and content of norms of general international law classified as peremptory (jus cogens). To do so, three questions will be answered: (i) how does jus cogens arise, (ii) how is jus cogens changed and eliminated and (iii) what is jus cogens “utility”? The first question will be answered by adopting a two-stage formal criterion, based on the provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. In this section, it will be demonstrated that jus cogens may have trivial content. Next, it will be argued that the process of modification and elimination of jus cogens depends to a great extent on the non-verification of the necessary conditions for its emergence. Finally, the “utility question” will deal with the alleged constitutionalist function of jus co- gens and its relevance, namely by limiting the power of the States and strengthening the rule of law.

References

D’Amato, Anthony. 1/1990. It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane, It’s Jus Cogens!. Connecticut Journal of International Law 6: 1–6.

D’Aspremont, Jean. 2018. Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Evans, Malcolm D. 2003. International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Focarelli, Carlo. 4/2008. Promotional Jus Cogens: A Critical Appraisal of Jus Cogens’ Legal Effects. Nordic Journal of International Law 77: 429–459.

Gülgeç, Yahya. 1/2017. The problem of jus cogens from a theoretical perspective. Ankara Üni. Hukuk Fak. Dergisi 66: 73–115.

Hameed, Asif. 1/2014. Unravelling the mystery of Jus Cogens in International Law. The British Yearbook of International Law 84: 52–102.

Hart, Herbert L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

International Law Commission. 2022. Report of the International Law Commission, Seventy-third session (18 April–3 June and 4 July–5 August 2022).

Jovanović, Miodrag. 2019. The Nature of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kelsen, Hans. 2019. Reine Rechtslehere. Coimbra: Almedina.

Klabbers, Jan. 2013. International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kolb, Robert. 2015. Peremptory International Law – Jus Cogens. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Linderfalk, Ulf. 3/2013. The Source of Jus Cogens Obligations – How Legal Positivism Copes with Peremptory International Law. Nordic Journal of International Law 82: 369–389.

Linderfalk, Ulf. 5/2017. The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Ever Think About the Consequences? The European Journal of International Law 18: 853–871.

Lopes, Pedro Moniz. 2014. Derrotabilidade Normativa e Normas Administrativas [photocopied]. Lisboa. Universidade de Lisboa.

Orakhelasshvili, Alexander. 2006. Peremptory norms in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Raz, Joseph. 1979. The Authority of Law – Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shaw, Malcolm. 2017. International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published
23.07.2023
Section
Articles