КАКО ПРЕДАВАТИ УСТАВНО ПРАВО У ДВАДЕСЕТ ПРВОМ ВЕКУ
Сажетак
Почетком XXI века конституционалистички дискурс је доживео фундаменталне промене. Отворене су нове, велике теме инспирисане уставним плурализмом и конституционализмом изван националне државе. Системски изазови модерног либералног конституционализма подстакли су нови приступ не само уставу већ и уставном праву, као предмету изучавања и подучавања. Наиме, криза кључних параметара конституционалне демократије захтева темељно преиспитивање обе димензије дидактике уставног права: сазнајно-предавачке и перформативно-предавачке. Отуда се у овом раду трага за одговорима на питањā шта и како предавати у доба постмодерног конституционализма. На то да професор не треба студентима само да опише феномен већ и да им објасни у чему је суштина проблема, указује се на примерима републиканског аргумента о нерелевантности класичног конституционализма, разлика између нормалности и патологије уставних система у контексту демократске транзиције и транснационализације устава и постмодерне парадигме о уставотворству без уставотворне власти. О потреби интердисциплинарности и мултидисциплинарности, укључујући и „co-teaching“, разматра се поводом питања монистичког и плуралистичког федерализма и уставних гаранција индивидуалних и/или колективних права. Рад се завршава закључком да савремена дидактика уставног права треба да се руководи глобалном сумњом као херменеутиком истине и етичко-политичког разматрања.
Референце
Arato, Andrew. 2006. Post Sovereign Constitution Making and Democratic Legitimacy. 92–105. Souveränität, Recht, Moral. Die Grundlagen politischer Gemeinschaft, eds. Tine Stein, Hubertus Buchstein, Claus Offe. Frankfurt – New York: Campus Verlag.
Баста Флајнер, Лидија Р. 2014. Изазови постмодерног конституционализма и криза устава. 15–26. Устави у времену кризе. Постјугословенска перспектива, ур. Милан Подунавац, Биљана Ђорђевић. Београд: Факултет политичких наука. (Basta Flajner, Lidija R. 2014. Izazovi postmodernog konstitucionalizma i kriza ustava. 15–26. Ustavi u vremenu krize. Postjugoslovenska perspektiva, ur. Milan Podunavac, Biljana Đorđević. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka.)
Basta Fleiner, Lidija R., Tanasije Marinković. 2014. Internationalization of
Constitutionalism and Constitutionalisation of International Law. 111– 215. Key Developments in Constitutionalism and Constitutional Law, eds. Lidija R. Basta Fleiner, Tanasije Marinković. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
Basta Fleiner, Lidija, Jean-Francois Gaudreault-DesBiens. 2013. Federalism and Autonomy. 143–158. Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law, eds. Mark Tushnett, Thomas Fleiner, Cheryl Saunders. London: Routledge.
Bellamy, Richard. 2007. Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490187
Bhabha, Homi K. 2006. Boundaries, Differences, Passages. http://www.volkswagenstiftung.de/fileadmin/downloads/Bhabha__Homi.pdf
Choudry, Sujit. 2008. Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Constitutional Systems of the World. Hart Publishing. Oxford Series on World Constitutions. http://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/ series/constitutional-systems-of-the world/?SeriesName=Constitutional+Systems+of+the+World&SeriesFullTitle=Constitutional+Systems+of+the+World/
Cooper, Robert. 2002. The new liberal imperialism. Guardian. April 7. http:// www.theguardian.com/world/2002/apr/07/1.
Cooper, Robert. 2003. The Breaking of Nations. Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
Eagleton, Terry. 1998. Die Zeit. August 13.
Fabbrini, Sergio. 2007. Compound Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235612.001.0001
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas. 2006. Redefining Sovereignty via International Constitutional Moments? http://ssrn.com/abstract=873905.
Frankenberg, Günter. 3/2006. Comparing Constitutions. International Journal of Constitutional Law 4: 439–459.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol012
Ghai, Yash, Guido Galli. 2006. Constitution Building Process and Democratisation: Lessons Learned. IDEA. http://www.idea.int/publications/dchs/ upload/dchs_vol2_sec6_2.pdf.
Held, David. 1992. Democracy: From City-states to a Cosmopolitan Order. Political Studies 40 Special Issues: 10–39. http://www.academia. edu/2275250/Global_Citizenship_ Cosmopolitan_Futures.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01810.x
Hirschl, Ran. 1/2013. From Comparative Constitutional Law to Comparative Constitutional Studies. I•CON 11: 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos057
Hirschl, Ran. 2014. Comparative matters: the renaissance of comparative constitutional law. Oxdord: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, Vicki C. 2014. Important Developments in Comparative Constitutional Law. 219–230. Key Developments in Constitutionalism and Constitutional Law, eds. Lidija R. Basta Fleiner, Tanasije Marinković. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
Johnson, Glen. 1988. Human Rights in Divergent Conceptual Settings: How Do Ideas Influence Policy Choices? 41–59. Human Rights. Theory and Measurement, ed. David L. Cingranelli. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10122-1_3
Krastev, Ivan. 2012. Democracy as Self-Correction. Washington: Transatlantic Academy. http://www.transatlanticacademy.org/sites/default/files/publications/Krastev_DemocracySelfCorrection_Dec12_ web.pdf.
Krisch, Nico. 2010. Beyond Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228317.001.0001
Kumm, Mathias, Miguel Poiares Maduro, Neil Walker. 2008. Four Visions of Constitutional Pluralism, eds. Matej Avbelj, Jan Komárek. EUI Working Paper Law 21. http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/9372/ LAW_2008_21.pdf;jsessionid=3E7672CBA14CA2D14F512B76BFF58CCD?sequence=1.
Kumm, Mathias. 2006. Constitutionalism and the Cosmopolitan State. http:// ssrn.com/abstract=2338547.
Loughlin, Martin, Neil Walker. 2012. Introduction. 1–2. The Paradox of Constitutionalism, eds. Martin Loughlin, Neil Walker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552207.003.0001
Neves, Marcelo. 2013. Transconstitutionalism. Portland USA: Hart Publishing.
Preuß, Ulrich K. 2010. Disconnecting Constitutions from Statehood: Is Global Constitutionalism a Viable Concept? 23–46. The Twilight of Constitutionalism?, eds. Petra Doebner, Martin Loughlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585007.003.0002
Preuss, Ulrich. K. 1994. Revolution, Fortschritt und Verfassung. Frankfurt: Fischer Verlag.
Smith, Graham. ed. 1995. Federalism. The Multiethnic Challenge. London: Longman.
Smith, Graham. ed. 2014. Federalism. The Multiethnic Challenge. 2. ed. London: Routledge.
Suresh, Kumar. 2004. Citizenship and Differential Rights of Minority Protection in India. Indian Journal of Federal Studies 2: 134–161.
Tanasescu, Simina. 2014. Les changements necessaries dans l’enseignement du droit constitutionnel. 231–236. Key Developments in Constitutionalism and Constitutional Law, eds. Lidija R. Basta Fleiner, Tanasije Marinković. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
Teubner, Günther. 2010. Fragmented Foundations: Societal Constitutionalism beyond Nation State. 327–341. The Twilight of Constitutionalism?, eds. Petra Doebner, Martin Loughlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585007.003.0016
Tsagourias, Nicolas. 2010. Transnational Constitutionalism. International and European Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tschentscher, Axel. 2011. Comparing Constitutions and International Constitutional Law: A Primer. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1502125.
Tully, James. 2012. The Imperialism of Modern Constitutional Democracy. 315–338. The Paradox of Constitutionalism, eds. Martin Loughlin, Neil Walker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van den Besselaar, Peter, Gaston Heimeriks. 2001. Disciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary. Concepts and Indicators. 8th conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics – ISSI2001. Sydney, Australia, July 16–20. http://heimeriks.net/2002issi.pdf.
Von Bogdandy, Armin. 2016. Comparative Constitutional Law as a Social Science? A Hegelian Reaction to Ran Hirschl’s Comparative Matters.
MPIL Research Papers Series No. 2016 – 09.
