DEFINING SOVEREIGN ASSETS FOR IMMUNITY FROM EXECUTION: INTERNATIONAL RULE OF LAW VERSUS INTERNATIONAL LAW - BASED RULE OF LAW
Apstrakt
Sovereign assets receive restrictive sovereign immunity based on their purpose and/or use for execution of States’ commercial liabilities. The forum States’ courts decide the question of immunity of these assets. Due to lack of effective international conventions, these judgements result at inconsistent outcomes. Rule of law can be applied to mitigate this inconsistency. However, the objectives of rule of law vary for the national and the international legal order. Moreover, the divergence in group-interests of States and mandate of international organizations have failed to agree on a uniform definition of international rule of law. Thereby, this paper suggests international law-based rule of law as an alternative approach. International law-based rule of law aims at achieving the same objectives as domestic legal order, but, by the tools of international laws. Finally, it proposes to develop an inter-States consensus-based model law to have uniform principles of sovereign assets’ immunity in international law.
Reference
Araya, Tomas. M. 2/2016, A Decade of Sovereign Debt Litigation: Lessons from the NML vs Argentina Case and the Road Ahead, Business Law International, 17: 83–101.
Badr, Gamal Moursi. 1984, State Immunity: An Analytical and Prognostic View, Springer.
Bankas, Ernest K. 2005, the State immunity controversy in international law: private suits against sovereign States in domestic courts, Springer.
Barr, Mallory. 2/2016, The Litigation Tango of La Casa Rosada and the Vultures: The Political Realities of Sovereign Debt, Vulture Funds and the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 7: 567–595.
Chesterman, Simone. July 2007, Rule of Law, Max Plank Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford Public International Law.
Chesterman, Simone. 3/2007, Secrets and Lies: Intelligence Activities and the Rule of Law in Times of Crisis. Michigan Journal of International Law, 28: 553–573.
Chimni, Bhupinder Singh. 2012, Legitimating the international rule of law, in the Cambridge Companion to International Law, edited by James Crawford and Martti Koskenniemi, 290–308.
Chirwa, Danwood Mzikenge. 2004. The Doctrine of State Responsibility as a Potential Means of Holding Private Actors Accountable for Human Rights, Melbourne Journal of International Law Vol. 5: 1–36.
Dicey, Albert Venn. 1982, Introduction to the Study of the Constitution, Liberty Classics, Indianapolis.
Dolinger, Jacob, Carmen Tiburcio. 1998, The Forum Law Rule in International Litigation: Which Procedural Law Covers Proceedings to be Performed in Foreign Jurisdiction: Les Fori or Lex Diligentiae, Texas International Law Journal, 33: 425–461.
Frank, Susan D., James Freda, Kellen Lavin, Tobias Lehmann, Anne Van. Aaken. 2015, The Diversity Challenge: Exploring the ‘Invisible College’ of International Arbitration, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 53: 429–468.
Georges, R. Delaume. 2/1994, the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and Public Debt Litigation: Some Fifteen Years Later, the American Journal of International Law, 88: 257–279.
Hazel, Fox QC. 2002, the Law of State Immunity, Oxford University Press.
Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, Massimo Mastruzzi. July 2007, Governance Matters VI: Governance Indicators for 1996–2006, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4280.
Kurkela, Matti S., Santtu Turunen. 2010, Conflict Management Institute, Due Process in Commercial Arbitration, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press.
Neumann, Franz. 1985, the rule of law: Political theory and the legal system in modern society, Leamington Spa: Berg.
Nollkaemper, Andre, Jan Wouters, Nicolas Hachez. 2008, Accountability and the Rule of Law at International Level, https://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/typo3/site/fileadmin/reports/report%20Accountability%20and%20Rule%20of%20Law.pdf [last visited 12 February 2021]
Rodoljub, Etinski, Tubic Bojan. January 2016, International Law and Rule of Law, Anali Pravong fakultela u Beogradu 64(3): 57–74.
Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy. 2017, the International Law on Foreign Investment, 4th Ed., Cambridge University Press.
Strong, S. I. 2/2018, General Principles of Procedural Law, Penn. State Law Review, 122: 347–409.
Thompson, Edward Palmer. 1975, Wings and Hunters, the Origins of the Black Act, New York: Pantheon; Unger RM, Law in Modern Society, New York Free Press.
Waldron, Jeremy. 1/2008, The Concept and the Rule of Law, Georgia Law Review, 43: 7–9.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2011, Are Sovereigns Entitled to the Benefits of the International Rule of Law? The European Journal of International Law (EJIL), 2: 316–343.
Weidemaier, W. Mark C., Anna Gelpern. 1/2014, Injunctions in Sovereign Debt Litigation, Yale Journal on Regulation, 31: 189–218.
United National Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Working Group 3 Investor State Dispute Settlement https://uncitral. un.org/en/working_groups/3/investor-state (last visited 15 February 2021).
Zdobnoh, Dmitri, Rene Vark. 2009/2010, State Immunity from Execution: In Search of a Remedy, Acta Societatis Marternsis, 4: 161–183.
